Post by raihan110 on May 19, 2024 5:12:08 GMT -5
Osborne simply stated the need to be free of criticism and negative feedback. Create a comfortable environment for brainstorming participants. Quantity over quality. Let your thoughts flow. No judgment zone. Osborne has also written several other best-selling books. All These books are all designed to teach people how to unleash their creativity. His titles Awaken Your Mind and Gold Mine In Your Ears both helped Osborne solidify his place in the industry. The article goes on to explain how Osborne's rules of not judging quantity over quality and not being negative are still used by many institutions today.
The most interesting element of this story is that although the brainstorming techniques developed by Osborne are still implemented they rarely produce the best ideas. This story lists several examples Maldives Email List that show that better ideas are created when people start working individually and then bring their ideas together as a team. Another observation that debunks Osborne's research is that not only do people produce results with some criticism but groups can actually thrive through conflict. It’s really interesting to think about this. Conflict and criticism force people to re-evaluate their ideas, values and positions. I suggest you pick up an issue of The New Yorker and check out the article It's a great article.
There's a lot of really interesting information and there's even a brief discussion of how Steve Jobs forced Pixar employees to bump into each other to spark conversation just like the way he chose to design the building. In the world of government I think this story has some interesting applications particularly in terms of how we think about open innovation and crowdsourcing information. The government doesn't need more quantity of choice. The government needs to improve the quality. At the same time creative solutions need to be encouraged so too much structure does not allow people to unleash their creativity.
The most interesting element of this story is that although the brainstorming techniques developed by Osborne are still implemented they rarely produce the best ideas. This story lists several examples Maldives Email List that show that better ideas are created when people start working individually and then bring their ideas together as a team. Another observation that debunks Osborne's research is that not only do people produce results with some criticism but groups can actually thrive through conflict. It’s really interesting to think about this. Conflict and criticism force people to re-evaluate their ideas, values and positions. I suggest you pick up an issue of The New Yorker and check out the article It's a great article.
There's a lot of really interesting information and there's even a brief discussion of how Steve Jobs forced Pixar employees to bump into each other to spark conversation just like the way he chose to design the building. In the world of government I think this story has some interesting applications particularly in terms of how we think about open innovation and crowdsourcing information. The government doesn't need more quantity of choice. The government needs to improve the quality. At the same time creative solutions need to be encouraged so too much structure does not allow people to unleash their creativity.